Report to the Academy
RE: the New Conflict of the Faculties
by Gregg Lambert

Book Summary:

Report to the Academy addresses the signs of the perceived crisis of the first-world university as the result of its take-over by a new model of administrative rationality. Rather than seeing this as an entirely new development, Professor Lambert reveals the striking similarities between the present day conflict over the idea of the university as a social and cultural institution, and the conflict over reason first outlined by the 18th century philosopher Immanuel Kant. Taking up the original argument of Kant’s The Conflict of the Faculties, as well as more recent arguments by philosophers and cultural critics such as Jacques Derrida, Jean-Francois Lyotard, Jurgen Habermas, Fredric Jameson, and Bill Readings, Report to the Academy offers a lively and compelling interpretation of the most critical issues underlying the contemporary debates over the fate of higher education. Lambert concludes his “report” by framing these issues in terms of two guiding questions, which he addresses to faculty and administrators alike: “What should count as “critical” social and cultural knowledge?” and “Who should have the authority to decide?” These questions, Lambert argues, return us to the very heart of the university’s mission for the larger society, and should become the occasion of “a new conflict of the faculties.”

Editorial Reviews:
Report to the Academy is a major reflection on the state of the university today, especially on the vexed question of the role of the humanities in the new transnational and corporation-dominated university now coming into being.  Anyone teaching humanities today will be aware of the changes that are taking place with unprecedented rapidity, but it is not all that easy to reflect with objectivity on just what those changes are or to explain them. Lambert's book does a superb job of accomplishing that, through careful readings of work by Kant, Lyotard, Derrida, Jameson, Habermas, Luhman, and Readings. Of special importance is his recognition of one important factor not made salient in earlier work. The university library used to be the major repository and data-base for the accumulated learning of our culture. You have to have proper credentials to have access to that data-base. Now the Internet is replacing the library as a kind of universal data-base, and one major function of the university is fading. You don't need to be in the university to have access to more and more material, for example the illuminated manuscript books of William Blake, once available only to a few specialists. Among many other astute insights, Lambert's book recognizes what a major change this is in the social role of the university
        -- J. Hillis Miller,UCI Distinguished Professor of English and Comparative Literature, University of California, Irvine.

 

In the wake of the culture wars, the academic job crisis, the drive for corporate sponsorship, and the increasingly prominent place of college sports, the contemporary American university, perhaps our most vital public institution seems to have lost its bearings. Gregg Lambert’s Report to the Academy takes a timely step back from all the brouhaha to conduct an analysis of the philosophical grounds of the university, from Kant to Derrida, Lyotard, and Readings. Next to Bill Reading’s University in Ruins (Harvard UP, 1996), Gregg Lambert’s Report to the Academy is an important statement advocating the “postcritical” university, one that productively questions both current disciplinary and administrative logic.
   
     -- Jeffrey J. Williams, University of Missouri at Columbia, editor of the minnesota review
 


 Table of Contents
I.. THE UNIVERSITY IN THE EARS OF ITS PUBLICS

Abstract of Part One
I(a). The Conflict of Cultures
I(b). The Return(s) of the Philosopher
I(c). The Subject at Large: On Derrida's "Position(s)"
I(d). The University in the Ears of its Publics
Summary & Transition

II. THE POSTMODERN CONDITION Y2K

Abstract of Part Two
II(a). Assessing Lyotard's Report on Knowledge 20 Years After
II(b). The University in Cyberspace
II(c). How Philosophy Originally Solved the Problem of Legitimation
II(d). The Rise of the Performativity Principle and the Crisis of "De-Legitimation" (Nihilism)
Summary & Transition

III. ON LYOTARD'S WAR

Abstract of Part Three
III(a). The Trouble with Consensus (homologia)
III(b). The Phrase-There is a Language (logos)
III(c). Dueling Meta-Narratives
III(d). Who Bears Witness for the Witness? On the "Ethical Turn"
Summary & Transition

CONCLUSION & SUMMARY